Fashion Disaster: Luxury Takes a Hit in Moscow

Fashion Disaster: Luxury Takes a Hit in Moscow

Fewer Bentleys cruise the streets of Moscow these days, sushi sales are down, and construction on Europe’s tallest tower has halted for lack of money. For fashionistas at the opening of the 18th annual Russian Fashion Week on Sunday, the most potent sign of the times was the sight of people wearing last year’s styles. “Even the very rich aren’t just going out and buying anymore,” says Tatyana Ageyeva, a buyer who has worked for élite labels like Kenzo and Hugo Boss for nearly a decade. “Before, the wealthy would buy expensive things because they didn’t care. Even if they knew they wouldn’t wear it, that it would just sit in the closet, they would drop 3,000 euros. Now they are avoiding risks.”

Little wonder. The ruble has lost 30% of its value against the dollar in the past six months, while economic activity decreased 7.3% in February compared with the same month last year, Deputy Economic Development Minister Andrei Klepach said on March 24. The government has said the economy is likely to shrink 2.2% this year.

All this means fashion lovers are cutting back on spending. “Right now we are seeing signs of de-premiumization — meaning that shoppers are trading down for cheaper items,” says Victoria Grankina, a retail analyst at leading Russian investment bank Troika Dialog. “Overall, the luxury market really struggled in December and January, since the consumer was feeling quite under the weather. In March, we have been seeing some signs of stabilization, but we are not sure this is a trend. No one can predict when this will end.”

Rich Russians are accustomed to huge markups on luxury brands sold in their country. Top fashion labels can sell for up to 1,000% of what they would in the U.S. or Western Europe. But factor in inflation and the devaluation of the ruble, and the price is too high for many, says Grankina. “There is a layer of wealthy people who are willing to pay up, but when the ruble falls against other currencies, sellers pass that on to consumers at a time of inflation, so things become much more expensive.”

But while sales may have slumped, the spirit of some of Russia’s rich remains breezy. The élite GUM shopping mall, situated on Red Square, has seen its number of shoppers fall some 30% this year, according to Ageyeva, the buyer. But Lilya Bondarchuk, a manager at the Jil Sander store in GUM, says that “clients joke about the crisis and ask each other if they have noticed it yet.” Natalya Batalova, a corporate attorney who shops at GUM every few months, says she hasn’t felt the crisis so far. “I don’t know what it is,” she says with a laugh as she walks down one of the mall’s softly glowing arcades in a black fur coat and chic diamond earrings, with a big, white Kenzo shopping bag over her shoulder.

It is this attitude that buoys the soul of Russia’s biggest fashion designers. “Russian designers are in a more stable situation now,” argues Alexander Shumsky, the head of Artefact, the public-relations firm running Russian Fashion Week. “The biggest part of their business is to work with private clients. I’ve talked to some designers, and they say the situation is not critical — that clients have fallen off only 15% or 20%.” At the same time, Shumsky acknowledges that about 10 designers have pulled out of the fashion show this year because of a huge deficit in corporate sponsorships. “The smaller designers are feeling it the worst. It’s logical, because their production level is much less, so they can’t benefit from economies of scale,” says Troika Dialog’s Grankina.

Some high-end foreign boutiques like Stella McCartney and Alexander McQueen, which opened in Moscow just a year ago, have also closed their doors. Italian jeans retailer Diesel recently shut all its shops in Russia. Still, if Russia’s fashion industry has one thing to put its faith in, it is the Russian consumer’s penchant for flair. “It’s in the Russian character to be flashy. They’d never go for a simple style. They’d never spend lots of money to look like a street sweeper,” says Ageyeva. “That will never change.”

See pictures of Giorgio Armani.

Cast your votes for the 2009 TIME 100.

Share

India’s Dynastic Feud: A Gandhi Who Hates Muslims

Indias Dynastic Feud: A Gandhi Who Hates Muslims

The spectacle in India is riveting: virulent anti-Muslim diatribes spouted by a pedigreed and ambitious young Hindu politician who shares the surname of the world’s foremost apostle of non-violence and who is descended from the Prime Minister who founded modern India as a secular state to serve the country’s multiplicity of faiths. Since early March, Varun Gandhi, 29, has been the scandal of India’s political class after he called for, among many things, the hands of Muslims to be cut off if they are raised against Hindus, their throats to be slashed, their population to be culled by strict birth control. His words triggered India’s stringent National Security Act, and for days the young Gandhi was a fugitive from the law. The episode has highlighted the ugly feud that has split India’s historic First Family for years.

Varun Gandhi is the great-grandson of Jawaharlal Nehru, the country’s first Prime Minister. His grandmother was Nehru’s only child, Indira Gandhi, whose two sons, in turn, left legacies at odds with each other. The older son Rajiv, succeeded his mother as prime minister shortly after she was assassinated in 1984. Rajiv was later murdered in a 1994 terrorist bombing and his Italian-born widow, Sonia, now leads the ruling Congress Party. Rajiv’s younger brother, Sanjay, however, had been their mother Indira’s favorite and had been viewed as her heir apparent until his sudden death in a plane crash in 1980. Sanjay’s widow Maneka is now Sonia Gandhi’s implacable enemy. Maneka and her son Varun are now members of the Hindu nationalist organization, Bharatiya Janata Party , the most ferocious rival of Congress as well as Nehru’s secularist tenets.

The current political firestorm started as Varun was preparing to make his political debut in India’s general elections, which are now less than three weeks away. The young man seemed to be consciously raising one of the most controversial episodes in modern India’s history: Indira Gandhi’s Emergency Rule from 1975-1977, when she — with Sanjay as her chief advisor — ran the country on authoritarian lines, ruling by decree. One of those edicts led to forced sterilization to deal with India’s then huge population growth rate. Varun Gandhi allegedly referred to it in his virulent rallies in the first week of March by saying that the BJP “need to pick them [Muslims] up, one by one, and sterilize them.”

That together and other reported statements were enough to slap the National Security law against him, accusing him of promoting enmity between religious groups. Gandhi claimed the tapes were “doctored” and avoided turning himself in to the authorities by paying what is called “anticipatory bail.” But when the bail ran out, Gandhi gave himself up on Mar. 27. “I am not afraid of going to jail,” said Gandhi. “If it generates confidence in some people, I will go to jail.”

At first, his party had been confounded by the controversy. And there was some talk of fielding Maneka Gandhi as a candidate in her son’s place during the elections. But the party finally decided to stand by the young man after India’s Election Commission said in a 10-page report that Varun should be dropped as a candidate because of his “highly derogatory” remarks. The BJP shot back that the EC had no right to make that determination. The party may also have realized that they suddenly had a catalyst to bring supporters out to the election. At first, says Hyderabad-based political commentator Jyotirmaya Sharma, the “BJP didn’t know what to do.” It was riddled with internal rivalries and without a solid election plank. “Now it’s obvious they’re delighted about a Gandhi being in the right-wing fold.”

Many Indians are appalled not only that a descendant of Nehru is espousing such a political perspective but that his name and actions besmirch that of the great Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, who was assassinated by a Hindu extremist in 1948. While the Mahatma was not a blood relation of the Nehrus, a popular story has the philosopher of political non-violence, who was Indira’s godfather, allowing her fiance, a young Zoroastrian lawyer originally called Feroze Shah Ghandy, to restyle his surname as Gandhi, thus attaching prestige to a mixed marriage many Hindus would not have approved of. Priyanka Gandhi, Sonia’s daughter, said that her cousin Varun’s comments were against the traditions her family had “lived and died for.” There might have been a bigger political spectacle if Priyanka’s brother Rahul had been entered as a possible Congress candidate in the coming elections, but their mother nixed that suggestion.

It remains to be seen how the case of Varun Gandhi will affect the BJP’s chances. In any case, his supporters have not been quiet. On Saturday, after he turned himself in, they fought a pitched battle with the police and laid siege to the jail. Police responded by firing tear gas shells and charging the demonstrators with canes, injuring 25 people. His mother Maneka further stoked the anger when she claimed a Muslim officer had led the charge. In India’s often overheated politics, the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty knows about playing with fire.

Share

Japanese business confidence at record low

A businessman sits on an improvised chair at a Tokyo park on Tuesday.
Sentiment among Japan’s largest manufacturers is at a record low, according to a key business survey released Wednesday morning.

The Bank of Japan’s quarterly Tankan survey showed sentiment among large manufacturers plunged to minus 58 in March from minus 24 in December. The previous record low for the survey was minus 57, reached during the oil shock era of the mid-1970s. The negative sentiment cut across all large, medium and small enterprises, from manufacturers to non-manufacturers, was negative. The Tankan survey is a forward-looking and extensive indicator of the state of Japan’s economy. It gauges how global exporters in Japan — like Toyota and Honda — feel about the business conditions in which they operate. The survey is one of the few forward-looking indicators that give investors a window into the immediate future of the world’s second largest economy, and it helps the Bank of Japan set monetary policy. Kirby Daley, senior strategist at Newedge Group, hoped the survey might show a glimmer of hope towards Japan’s recovery, but braced for the worst Wednesday morning.

“The results of this Tankan actually reflect reality,” says Daley. “The reality is that Japan’s economy is in a very, very bad state and there is no quick and easy fix. The results of this survey really point to the dire situation that Japan’s economy is in.” The survey’s release comes a day after the government announced a jump in the country’s unemployment rate from 4.1 percent in January to 4.4 percent in February. Watch the bleak economic report »

Share

Desperation, smuggling the backdrop to migrant tragedy

Libyan police officers help rescued migrants off an overcrowded boat that arrived this week in Tripoli.
Desperation, sophisticated smuggling operations and the emergence of a small Italian island as a migrant destination provide the sad backdrop to Monday’s tragedy on the Mediterranean Sea — the capsizing of boats carrying African migrants from Libya to Italy.

Jean-Philippe Chauzy, spokesman for the International Organization for Migration, said Tuesday that Libya for years has been a destination for migrants from the rest of Africa. Its relatively successful economy is a magnet for people from impoverished regions, and its proximity makes it a logical jumping-off point for Europe. People from places such as Ghana, Nigeria, Niger and Burkina Faso long have traveled to Tripoli and other Libyan locations and have gotten work there, from construction to washing cars. Chauzy said even people from the Horn of Africa, where Somalis and Ethiopians have fled to Yemen via the Gulf of Aden, are choosing to travel to Libya rather than pursue a trip to Yemen. Asians as well are opting to travel to Europe from Libya. While some Africans hope to settle in Libya, many others have their eyes on moving onward to Europe. They tend to sail to Lampedusa, an Italian island lying southwest of Sicily and just north of the African coast — considered an advantageous way station for entrance into Europe. Italy has been bolstering its efforts to stop the illegal traffic. Some of the people who find their way to the island get asylum. Some migrants eventually are returned to their home countries, but others are taken from Lampedusa to facilities on the mainland, where they are sometimes simply released instead of being deported. Chauzy said people head to Europe first and foremost to help their families back home with a paycheck.

Don’t Miss
Hundreds feared dead off Libya

He said the global economic crisis has led to a drop in the money sent back home, and that in turn has affected hurting African economies, where prices for staple crops have plummeted. He said that the bolstering of border controls sparked by such a tragedy could prompt migrants to take other dangerous routes. Watch as details emerge on latest tragedy » Officials said at least hundreds of migrants are believed to have perished in the Mediterranean over the past year. Over the weekend, more than 200 African migrants are believed to have died after their vessel, carrying 250 people, capsized in rough waters. At least 20 people are confirmed dead, and 23 have been rescued. Another boat with more than 350 migrants aboard was rescued, and these migrants — mostly Africans but also including some Asians — were taken to Tripoli in Libya. The International Organization for Migration believes there are two other boats in the Mediterranean that could be carrying migrants. The flight of migrants on rough seas is not just a local phenomenon. “We are seeing it all over the world,” U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres said Tuesday. Smugglers, for example, also take people from western Africa to the Canary Islands, from Myanmar to Thailand, and from Turkey to Greece. Guterres said the tragedy shows the urgent measures people take “to escape conflict, persecution and poverty in search of a better life.” Some of the people can be classified as refugees — people fleeing war and persecution and who could qualify for asylum in other countries. Others are migrants from countries where there is no persecution. They are in search of jobs and a better life. Thousands have died on their journeys, but thousands have survived as well, with many awaiting asylum and resettlement opportunities. There has been much publicity about the flight of Ethiopians and Somalis across the Gulf of Aden to Yemen. Many have died en route, with smugglers at times throwing people overboard to avoid getting arrested by navies for their operations. Ron Redmond, the UNHCR spokesman, said he believes such movement will persist as the “economic situation continues to worsen worldwide.” The agency said the number of asylum seekers in industrialized countries increased last year for the second year running, in part because of higher numbers of asylum applications by citizens of Afghanistan, Somalia and other turbulent nations. Last year, 36,000 people arrived in Italy by sea from North Africa. Some 75 percent of them applied for asylum, and about 50 percent of those received some form of international protection from the Italian authorities. Demetrios G. Papademetriou, president of Washington-based think tank Migration Policy Institute, said the movement of migrants is organized, with smuggling syndicates making “obscene profits” and “enormous amounts of money.”

“These are organized flows,” Papademetriou said. As for the tragedy, “you will see this again and again and again,” he said.

Share

Sarkozy walkout threats at G-20, reports say


French President Nicolas Sarkozy wants a "real transformation" of international financial regulations out of this week’s G-20 summit in London, a spokesman said Tuesday amid reports that Sarkozy will walk out of the gathering if he’s not satisfied.

“President Sarkozy thinks that this summit is of the utmost importance for the whole world,” Sarkozy spokesman Jean-David Levitte said Tuesday. “We cannot fail.” The G-20 — financial leaders from 19 nations and the European Union — begins meeting Thursday in London. The global monetary crisis is expected to be the central issue. News outlets throughout Europe on Tuesday were reporting that Sarkozy would leave the summit or otherwise disrupt it if he doesn’t feel members are seriously addressing business regulation, a crackdown on tax havens and other matters related to the world market. iReport.com: Do you live in a G-20 nation Share your story Top aides to the president would not directly confirm his plans, but suggested in several reports that Sarkozy is considering some sort of action. “A basic rule with nuclear deterrence is that you do not say at what point you will use the weapon,” Xavier Musca, Sarkozy’s deputy chief of staff, told the London Times.

Don’t Miss
Protesters, police go online

Explainer:  Crisis dominates summit

Map: How is the world coping with the crisis

Special: G-20: Rebuilding the Global Economy

iReport.com: What do you want from G-20

Levitte said Sarkozy wants to see “better rules, stronger rules” governing international commerce. That would include monitoring bonuses and salaries of financiers, overseeing accounting of major institutions and better monitoring of countries where corporations are able to establish home offices to avoid paying taxes in G-20 nations. Watch faces of the economic crisis in France » “All this is very technical in nature, but if we act decisively it means a real transformation of the way capitalism is functioning,” Levitte said. “And hopefully, we will make sure through these decisions that what happened will not happen again.” Simon Johnson, the former chief economist with the International Monetary Fund, dismissed the potential for a walkout by France, saying the threat likely was leaked as an act of showmanship as the summit approaches. “It would be a disaster. It would be taken very badly by financial markets,” said Johnson, now an economics professor at MIT. “I’m sure it’s done for a domestic audience — a little bit of chest-beating.” Johnson said that it’s folly to expect many sweeping changes out of the summit. On his blog, The Baseline Scenario, he writes that an outline of the meeting’s goals shows that “the G-20 punts on most of the big issues.” But he pointed to a handful of possibilities — including the chance that the group will go along with a U.S. plan that would dramatically increase funding for the IMF. The IMF works to stabilize the economies in poor and developing countries by providing loans and through other means. “It’s better than nothing — it’s better than a kick in the teeth,” he said. “That’s the spirit with which you should approach these things. “You don’t usually get summits with drastic results.” On Tuesday, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said G-20 leaders need to reshape the global economy to reflect world values. “Instead of a globalization that threatens to become values-free and rules-free, we need a world of shared global rules founded on shared global values,” Brown said. U.S. President Barack Obama arrived in London for the summit on Tuesday, making his first visit to Europe since taking office. View the Obama itinerary of his trip to Europe » There, he’ll pitch on the world stage the economic-recovery package he recently pushed through Congress.

“I think it’s likely that we will come out of the G-20 with very broad agreement on measures that have to be taken to address the global recession,” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters on Air Force One. Afterward Obama will visit France, Germany, the Czech Republic and Turkey to wrap up an eight-day trip.

Share

McCain: Afghanistan challenge ‘not as tough’ as Iraq

Sen. John McCain says he supports President Obama's efforts in Afghanistan.
While President Obama has insisted that securing Afghanistan against a rise in terrorist groups is a top priority in the war on terrorism, Sen. John McCain said Tuesday that the problems in that country are not as thorny as those in Iraq.

“It’s [Afghanistan’s] not as tough as Iraq, and don’t let anyone tell you that it is, because when we started the [2007] surge, Iraq was virtually in a state of collapse,” McCain said during a speech at The Foreign Policy Initiative. President Obama announced a troop increase Friday of 4,000 in Afghanistan, in addition to the 17,000 previously announced. Obama said those troops will help train the Afghan army and police. While McCain said he supports the president’s efforts in Afghanistan, he would increase the Afghan army beyond the planned levels. “I would have announced a dramatic increase in the Afghan army. I’m talking about a 200, 250 thousand-person army. It’s a big country, it’s a big population,” he said. Watch more about Obama’s plan » McCain also said that like him, many Republicans support Obama’s plan in Afghanistan, but that will probably change. “I don’t think there’s any doubt that in a year from now, we will be looking at a greater level of opposition to the war than we are seeing today,” he said. The Arizona senator also rejected the idea that success in Afghanistan depends on stability in Pakistan.

Don’t Miss
Obama: U.S. prepared to pursue targets in Pakistan

Analysis: Americans wary about war in Afghanistan

“This notion that you can’t succeed in Afghanistan without a success in Pakistan, I don’t subscribe with it. We need a strategy for both countries, but we also need a separate strategy in regards to Pakistan by itself,” McCain said. Obama has said that his administration is prepared to continually adjust its strategy in Pakistan and Afghanistan as necessary. On Friday, Obama announced a new plan for the region calling for, among other things, more U.S. troops, greater economic assistance, improved Afghan troop training and added civilian expertise to defeat the “terrorists who planned and supported the 9/11 attacks.” “Let me be clear: Al Qaeda and its allies — the terrorists who planned and supported the 9/11 attacks — are in Pakistan and Afghanistan,” he said Friday. “Multiple intelligence estimates have warned that al Qaeda is actively planning attacks on the U.S. homeland from its safe haven in Pakistan.” On Tuesday, McCain said that achieving victory in Afghanistan is vital to American national security. “We will and can and must succeed, but it’s not going to be easy,” he said. Those comments come just weeks after McCain insisted the U.S. is losing the war in Afghanistan. McCain, speaking at the American Enterprise Institute in late February, said, “When you aren’t winning in this kind of war, you are losing. And, in Afghanistan today, we are not winning.” But it was McCain who, during the 2008 presidential election, blasted Obama for believing the U.S. was losing the war in Afghanistan. Shortly after Obama laid out his foreign policy vision in Washington in mid-July of 2008, McCain criticized his proposals as naive and premature. “Sen. Obama will tell you we can’t win in Afghanistan without losing in Iraq. In fact, he has it exactly backwards. It is precisely the success of the surge in Iraq that shows us the way to succeed in Afghanistan,” he said. “It is by applying the tried and true principles of counter-insurgency used in the surge — which Sen. Obama opposed — that we will win in Afghanistan. With the right strategy and the right forces, we can succeed in both Iraq and Afghanistan. McCain’s Afghanistan proposal at the time included the addition of brigades, the launch of an integrated nationwide security plan for the civilian population, greater military engagement of Taliban forces and unity of command, a doubling of the size of the Afghan army, a boost in civilian-military engagement and the appointment of an “Afghanistan czar.” A Vietnam War veteran, former prisoner of war and longtime member of the Armed Services Committee, McCain said that while he knows Americans “are weary of war … we must win [in Afghanistan]. The alternative is to risk that country’s return to its previous function as a terrorist sanctuary, from which al Qaeda could train and plan attacks against America.” According to a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll conducted in February, two-thirds of Americans overall oppose the war in Iraq, but 64 percent of Democrats oppose the war in Afghanistan. Bill Schneider, CNN senior political analyst, says that Americans are wary about Afghanistan because of the recession, Iraq war fatigue and frustration. Watch CNN’s Bill Schneider analyze the poll »

According to the poll, only 31 percent of Americans believe the United States is winning the war in Afghanistan, and 50 percent believe the United States is winning in Iraq, the highest number in at least five years. The poll surveyed 1,046 adult Americans by telephone February 18-19. The sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Share

Ohio man seeks trial over getting DUI on motorized barstool


An Ohio man says he is seeking a jury trial on a charge of driving under the influence that was slapped on him after he crashed the vehicle he was piloting — a barstool.

Share

Al-Qaeda Infiltrating Pro-U.S. Militias in Iraq, Sources Say

Al-Qaeda Infiltrating Pro-U.S. Militias in Iraq, Sources Say

Sheik Hamid al-Hayess is not optimistic. A burly man with a thick black mustache and closely knitted brows, he is one of the founding members of the Anbar Awakening. The grouping of Sunni tribal sheiks in the once al-Qaeda–infested western province turned against the insurgents and sided with the U.S. military, providing the model for what became a nationwide campaign known as the Sahwa. But that model is in trouble. “The Sahwa has been infiltrated by al-Qaeda,” he says somberly. “A civil war is coming.”

If it happens, this time the lines in the sand will more likely be between Sunnis. Iraq’s minority Sunnis have become increasingly split between those like Sheik Hamid, who are now allied with the Shi’ite-led government, and Sunnis who are against it. Some co-religionists remain so antigovernment that they either have returned to the insurgency or sympathize with those who have.

In recent months, al-Qaeda in Iraq and its affiliates have been regrouping, recalibrating their targets and tactics; they have recruited disenfranchised members of the U.S.-allied Sahwa movement, planting them as sleeper agents among the mainly Sunni neighborhood patrolmen, who number about 94,000 nationwide, according to a highly placed source close to the insurgency. “Many of the Sahwa have returned after seeking forgiveness, but they are still Sahwa,” the source tells TIME. “They wear the government’s uniform, but they plant explosives and sticky bombs. The Sahwa is the biggest recruiting pool for al-Qaeda.”

The source claims that some 40% of the Sahwa are insurgent spies. A senior source in the Interior Ministry who requested anonymity does not deny the infiltration but puts the figure at closer to 20%. The Interior Ministry source says intelligence agencies are reviewing the Sahwa files. Abdel-Karim Samarraie, the deputy leader of the parliament’s defense and security committee and a senior member of the Tawafuk, the largest Sunni bloc, says al-Qaeda moles represent a small minority of Sahwa but should be weeded out. “The Interior Ministry fired 62,000 of its employees because there were legal accusations against them,” he says. “The same thing can be applied to the Sahwa.” The U.S. military did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

This new security threat comes as the U.S. military prepares to withdraw its forces from Iraq’s cities by June, ahead of a complete withdrawal by the end of 2011. But in many ways, U.S. troop numbers and locations are secondary factors. This is an Iraqi problem, one that stems from festering political rivalries and suspicions among the country’s competing centers of power.

Those suspicions made some members of the Sahwa easy pickings for a tenacious insurgency that has capitalized on the rising resentment many in the Sunni community feel toward Shi’ite Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s government. Among their complaints: that Baghdad has sometimes been a month or two late in forking over the $300-a-month salary for Sahwa patrolmen; that Sahwa leaders have been arrested, sometimes on charges harking back to their insurgent past, despite promises of amnesty; and most significant, that the government has been slow to make good on its pledge to incorporate 20% of the Sahwa into the security forces and find government jobs or civilian training for the rest.

There are conflicting reports as to how many Sahwa have been absorbed into the Iraqi security forces. Interior Ministry spokesman Abdul-Karim Khalaf says 13,000 have been trained and placed in local police units. Major General Mike Ferriter, deputy operations commander of the U.S.-led forces, says the police have taken in 5,000 and the army 500. Even so, the figure is clearly not the promised 20%. A recent hiring freeze in the security forces — prompted by budget woes due to the massive drop in oil prices, which account for about 90% of government revenues — has further reduced the likelihood that the 20% benchmark will be achieved anytime soon.

As poverty, broken government promises and feelings of marginalization took hold of the Sunni community, all al-Qaeda and its allies had to do was wait. “The coalition and the Iraqi government told the people that the reason for their poverty was the insurgents. But when the people became Sahwa, their poverty was not alleviated,” the insurgent source says. “They realized that their poverty was due to the Americans and the government. That’s what’s happening in western Baghdad.”

See pictures of U.S. troops’ 6 years in Iraq.
See the Cartoons of the Week.

Share

Mom’s plea deal includes ‘resurrection clause’

Under terms of her plea agreement, Ria Ramkissoon's charges will be dropped if her son rises from the dead.
A Maryland woman involved with a group described as a religious cult pleaded guilty in the starvation death of her son, but insisted that the charges be dropped when he is resurrected.

The condition was made a part of Ria Ramkissoon’s plea agreement, officials said. She entered the plea Monday in Baltimore, Maryland, to a first-degree felony count of child abuse resulting in death, her attorney, Steven Silverman, said Tuesday. Ramkissoon, a member of a group called One Mind Ministries, believes Javon Thompson, her year-old son, will rise again, and as part of her plea agreement, authorities agreed to the clause. “She certainly recognizes that her omissions caused the death of her son,” Silverman said. “To this day, she believes it was God’s will and he will be resurrected and this will all take care of itself. She realizes if she’s wrong, then everyone has to take responsibility … and if she’s wrong, then she’s a failure as a mother and the worst thing imaginable has happened. I don’t think that, mentally, she’s ready to accept that.” Under the plea agreement, Ramkissoon, 22, must testify against four other One Mind Ministries members who are also facing charges, including first-degree murder, in Javon’s death. At her sentencing, set for August, she will receive a 20-year sentence, which will be suspended except for the time she has already served behind bars, Silverman said. She must also undergo deprogramming and psychiatric counseling. In court Monday, it was clarified that the “resurrection clause” would apply only in the case of Javon’s actual resurrection — not a perceived reincarnation, Silverman said. “This has never come up in the history of American law, as far as I’ve seen,” Silverman said, adding that the clause was “very important to her.” “On one level, she certainly is competent to stand trial, because she does recognize that as far as her legal entanglements are concerned, this is a grand-slam resolution for her,” Silverman said. “On the other hand, she’s still brainwashed, she’s still delusional as far as the teachings and influence of this cult, and she certainly is going to benefit with professional help and deprogramming.” Ramkissoon and the others are accused of denying Javon food after the group’s leader, a 40-year-old woman who goes by the name Queen Antoinette, decreed the boy was a demon since he refused to say “amen” after meals, Silverman said. “Ria would cling to him every day and try to get him to say ‘amen,’ ” Silverman said. Eventually, Queen Antoinette ordered that Ramkissoon be separated from the child, he said. Javon is believed to have died in December 2006, court documents allege. Following his death, the group members put the boy’s body in a back room, and “everyone was directed to come in and pray,” according to the documents. “The Queen told everyone that ‘God was going to raise Javon from the dead.’ Javon remained in the room for an extended period of time (in excess of one week). The resurrection never took place.” Authorities believe the boy’s body was then placed into a wheeled suitcase along with mothballs and fabric-softener sheets, documents said. Prosecutors allege Antoinette opened the suitcase periodically and sprayed its interior with Lysol to mask the decomposition odor. The group then moved to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and befriended a man who agreed to take care of their luggage before they left, documents said. The body was found in April 2008, still inside the suitcase, in the man’s storage shed. All five One Mind Ministries members were set to stand trial Monday. The case against the others has been postponed, Silverman said, as Antoinette and another woman lack attorneys and must either obtain one or waive their right to counsel. Silverman added that Antoinette has suggested, though not said outright, that God is representing her. Court documents say Ramkissoon joined One Mind Ministries after Javon’s birth in 2005. Silverman described her as a petite, soft-spoken woman who rejected her family’s Hindu religion, became a devout Christian and wanted to raise her son in that religion. “She didn’t want to have to work or go to school. She just wanted to take care of her son, and they offered her all this,” he said. The group insisted she wear a uniform the colors of royalty: white, tan and blue; give up her cell phone; stop referring to her family members by name; and not leave her home on her own, among other things, he said. “They really isolated her, brainwashed her, and you see what happened.” Ramkissoon’s mother, Seeta Khadan Newton, notified various agencies that her grandson was missing after she traveled to New York City in February 2008 to find her daughter, court documents said. Newton told authorities that when she spoke to Ramkissoon and asked about Javon, her daughter replied, “He’s gone. He’s lost,” but gave no further information. Silverman said he realized right away after consulting with Ramkissoon that he needed to communicate her story to the public and to prosecutors. “Once you get to understanding the story, understanding what Ria went through, and her intentions … it becomes quite clear that Ria, although many may not think her hands are clean, a reasonable, rational person would have some sympathy.”

Share

Obama in Europe: His Four Biggest Challenges

Obama in Europe: His Four Biggest Challenges

A European vacation it is not. Over the next week, President Barack Obama will board his plane anew nearly every day so that he can
attend individual meetings with at least 17 political leaders from 11
nations, and appear at summits and forums in five countries to discuss
international economic recovery, national security, cyber threats and global
warming. He will have tea with a Queen , a private chat with a King
, and convene a round table with students .

At each stage of the trip, whether in a castle or a palace,
diplomatic opportunity and danger lurk. The White House has prepared for
months to ensure that the dozens of events come off without a gaffe, a hitch
or a flub. But even years of planning could not make such events fail-safe.
The world is in far too much turmoil, with widespread concern
about the economic collapse, unruly voting publics and continued regional
instabilities, which are sure to burst into public view. At the same time,
Obama’s central policy proposals, which include a significant expansion of
the military effort in Afghanistan and major new deficit spending by wealthy
countries, have encountered resistance from his counterparts around the world. Here is a look at
four of the biggest challenges facing Obama as he heads overseas on his
first major foreign trip, and how he plans to handle them.

Stimulus Spending

As an economic theory, the concept is widely accepted: When consumer and
corporate spending collapses, government should increase its spending to prevent
a downward economic spiral. The real controversy comes with the next
questions: Which government and by how much Economists at the International
Monetary Fund have recommended globally coordinated stimulus spending of
about 2% of GDP to counteract the recession. But so far, that
challenge has only been accepted to varying degrees. As a group European
countries, as well as other members of the G-20 like France and Germany, have proposed lower rates of stimulus spending, both this year and next, raising concerns at the White
House.

In recent weeks, Obama and his advisers have made clear that
much of the rest of the world will have to step up to the plate, especially in
2010, if the economic downturn continues. “We don’t want a situation in
which some countries are making extraordinary efforts and other countries
aren’t, with the hope that somehow the countries that are making those
important steps lift everybody up,” Obama said last week, in a prime time
press conference. But so far, European leaders have been resistant to the
call for more stimulus. German Chancellor Angela Merkel has said she does
not want to be bogged down by “artificial discussions” of fiscal stimulus, and like many of her peers would prefer to focus on fashioning a new regulatory structure to make sure such excesses and abuses don’t threaten the global financial system again. Other European leaders have also voiced skepticism of new discretionary spending plans, arguing in part that the social safety net in Europe will
automatically increase spending to handle much of the downturn.

Rather than confront this conflict head on, both the Obama Administration
and European leaders have agreed to effectively dodge the issue for now, by
adopting language, in a draft comminique, that pledges all the nations to do
“whatever action is necessary until growth is restored.” At the same time,
White House aides have been arguing in recent weeks that the glass is half
full, and that the real test will only come if a second round of stimulus
efforts in needed. “There’s been an unprecedented coming together around
stimulating the global economy,” says Michael Froman, one of Obama’s top
international economic advisers. In other words, the battle over the size of
economic stimulus will be mostly fought later, when economists have a better
handle on the state of the economy and how much additional stimulus is needed.

Help for the Afghanistan Surge

Obama’s new plan for winning the war in Afghanistan and Pakistan is sweeping
and resource-intensive, and it cannot be accomplished by the U.S. alone. “As
America does more, we will ask others to join us in doing their part,” Obama
announced last week. “From our partners and NATO allies, we will seek not
simply troops, but rather clearly defined capabilities: supporting the
Afghan elections, training Afghan security forces, a greater civilian
commitment to the Afghan people.”

The details of the commitments sought by Obama have not yet been
announced publicly, though Obama’s team has been working closely with many
allies, both in Europe and beyond, to request specific aid. “We are making
very specific asks,” said Michelle Flournoy, an undersecretary of defense
for policy, who has been working on the Afghanistan plan. Obama plans to make a public pitch for international aid both at the NATO Summit in Strasbourg on Friday and at the European Union summit in Prague on Saturday.

Perhaps to head off any potential confrontations, however, the White House
has not said that it expects any firm commitments in the coming week. On
Saturday, Denis McDonough, one of Obama’s national security advisers,
acknowledged the issue directly. “The challenge that we face is working
closely with our friends and allies to underscore where we think we have
shared challenges and where we address shared threats,” he said. “And so
that’s obviously going to be an issue we discuss with our NATO allies.”

Getting the Small Things Right

Sometimes in diplomacy, the small things matter the most. In early March,
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton handed her Russian counterpart a “reset”
button intended to symbolize the American desire to “reset our relationship.” Russian
foreign minister Sergei Lavrov looked at the gift and smiled. “You got it
wrong,” he said, in perfect English. The button was printed with the word
“peregruzka,” which actually means overcharge or overload. Oops. Just days
earlier, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown had visited the White House
bearing rarified gifts: a first edition biography of Winston Churchill and a
pen holder carved from the timbers of the HMS Gannet. Obama responded by
giving Brown a set of Hollywood movie DVDs, sparking outrage in the British
press, who took the mass-produced gift as evidence that Obama “dislikes
Britain.”

Two times is a coincidence, but three times makes a trend, so Obama will have
to be careful about his gift giving in Europe. On Saturday, White House
spokesman Robert Gibbs declined a British reporter’s request to disclose the
gift the President will give Queen Elizabeth II. “We don’t want to give away all of our
good news,” said Gibbs, raising the stakes even higher. Indeed gifts are not
the only petty detail that can soil an international relationship. The
British press has also harped on the fact that Obama once referred to the
“special partnership” between Britain and the U.S., instead of the
traditional evocation of the “special relationship.” Such granular details
manage to exhaust some on Obama’s staff. “I continue to by mystified
about the difference between the two words,” says Gibbs.

The Star Factor

At the moment, the world is roiled, leaders are nervous, and everyone wants
a piece of the media magnet that is Barack Obama. That means the White House
is expecting all kinds of potential posturing in and around the meetings
with Obama for domestic consumption in various nations. Will Russian leader
Dmitry Medvedev use the meeting to highlight the American role in the
financial collapse Will Chinese President Hu Jintao bring up the proposal
for a new international currency to supplant the U.S. dollar Will Mirek
Topolanek, the recently displaced prime minister of the Czech Republic,
renew his rhetoric about the “road to hell” that Obama’s economic policies
present, when they meet in Prague

Several European leaders who will host Obama are likely to use
their meetings with the U.S. President to smooth the political waters at
home. In Britain, amid rising unemployment, Prime Minister Gordon Brown faces daunting approval
ratings and new elections in just over a year. In
Germany, Angela Merkel’s governing coalition is coming under increasing
strain, with elections just six months away. And then there are the street
protesters who will be vying for the spotlight. Large protests — against
everything from capitalism to the structure of bank bailouts — are planned
both for London and Strasbourg.

Though Obama can’t control all the people who will be riding his
public profile, his team has planned a series of events where the President
can deliver his own message directly to the world public. In
Strasbourg on Friday, he will host a town hall “taking some questions from
students from throughout Europe and discussing the transatlantic alliance,”
according to an aide. Then again in Turkey, Obama will host a “new media”
roundtable discussion with young people from Europe and southeast Asia. The
hope in the Administration is that despite the various distractions, Obama
will be able to maintain message control, something he showed a talent for
during the recently concluded Presidential campaign.

See TIME’s Pictures of the Week.

Share