Mexico’s Drug War Takes to the Barricades

Mexicos Drug War Takes to the Barricades

Masked teenagers lob bricks at police shields, middle-aged women wave banners and chant slogans against repression, while police tanks fire water cannons into rowdy crowds. These images may evoke anti-globalization protests at some high-powered economic summit, but in northern Mexico, they’re the latest flash point in the nation’s incessant drug war.

Daily demonstrations demanding that the army leave Mexico’s streets have erupted in towns and cities along Mexico’s border with Texas and down the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Protesters have blocked main avenues, slowed traffic across international bridges into the U.S. and clashed with federal police. The Mexican authorities blame this entire movement on the Gulf drug cartel and its bloody band of enforcers known as the Zetas. The demonstrators, says the government, are simply a rent-a-mob being deployed in desperation against a military-led crackdown on the cartels.

The protesters are having none of it, saying they’re on the streets because soldiers rape, rob and murder civilians and have not made the streets any safer from the wrath of gangsters. Whatever the true motive or motives behind the protests, however, the daily images of barricades and baton charges are raising fears that the drug war could combine with social unrest to further imperil Mexico’s increasingly precarious security situation.

Protests have been most intense in the industrial city of Monterrey, 140 miles south of Laredo, Texas. Demonstrations there began on Monday, Feb. 9, and as they grew in intensity, they produced clashes between hundreds of protesters and police on Feb. 17. The local state governor, Jose Natividad Gonzalez, accuses the Gulf cartel of orchestrating the disruptions. The crime syndicate is mimicking Mexico’s hard left, he says, busing in paid protesters from the barrios to run amok.

Gonzalez’ accusations are backed up by the army and federal government. Soldiers stormed the house of Juan Antonio Beltran, whom they accused of being a protest organizer and Gulf cartel operative. In statements to the local press, the military claimed that Beltran confessed to paying the demonstrators $15 to $35 each to take to the streets. “We have to stop criminal groups trying to generate chaos through co-optation and threats,” said Federal Public Safety Secretary Genaro Garcia Luna, the leading figure in President Felipe Calderón’s campaign against crime.

But activist Jorge Hernandez, who has demonstrated against the military in Mexico’s murder capital Ciudad Juarez, argues that the protests are a legitimate display of anger against the troops. “Soldiers are kidnapping people and robbing houses,” claims Hernandez, a member of a leftist group called the National Front Against Repression. “There are people who have been taken away by the military and not seen for months. Complaints to the authorities go nowhere. So now their family members are taking to the streets.” Hernandez says the protests have been staged by various social groups and community organizations that are voluntary and unpaid. He predicts they will grow larger amid discontent with repression, insecurity and the economic crisis.

Calderón put the army on the front lines of the fight against cartels as soon he took office in December 2006. There are now some 50,000 troops deployed against the gangsters, both in the marijuana-growing mountains and in cities such as Juarez, Monterrey and Tijuana. That campaign has coincided with skyrocketing violence, as criminal gangs wage war on government forces and on one another, leaving more than 5,300 dead last year. Many citizens support the soldiers, whom they see as Mexico’s only hope against thugs armed with high-powered rifles and rocket-propelled grenades. Still, the National Human Rights Commission has documented hundreds of accusations of military abuses, including the killing of at least 13 unarmed civilians and the rape of four women.

Political analyst Jose Antonio Crespo suggests the protests are, indeed, the work of drug cartels, who he says are throwing everything they have into their fight against the government crackdown. But he argues that Calderón has made a mistake by keeping the soldiers on the streets throughout his first two years in office. “The army could be tolerated as an extreme measure. But now they have become the first level of enforcement against the cartels,” he said. Crespo contends that this deployment has actually weakened the army’s position. While criminals once viewed the troops as untouchable, they now target them on a daily basis. Since October, gunmen have killed 21 soldiers and officers, including a recently retired general who was assassinated in the resort of Cancún earlier this month. “The army used to be seen as the government’s great deterrent,” Crespo says. “But now what is the big stick that can be used against the cartels Foreign intervention”

See pictures of Culiacán, the home of Mexico’s drug-trafficking industry. See pictures of the fence between the United States and Mexico.

Share

Richard Gere’s Scandalous Smooch

Richard Geres Scandalous Smooch

How can the country that gave the world the Kama Sutra be so prudish? It’s a longstanding cliché to note that India has produced both the world’s most famous guide to love and erotic pleasure and some of the most conservative social rules this side of Saudi Arabia on such questions as kissing in public. That paradox was on display once again this week in the firestorm that swept India following a seemingly innocuous — and obviously staged — celebrity kiss on the cheek at an AIDS-awareness event.

The nationwide furor began when Hollywood actor Richard Gere and
Bollywood actress Shilpa Shetty appeared together at an AIDS-awareness function in New Delhi last Sunday. The event was supposed to highlight the risky sexual behavior of truck drivers, who have some of the highest rates of HIV infection in India. At one point in the proceedings, Gere embraced Shetty, bent her back in an exaggerated kind of dance hold and kissed her on the cheek. If it looked slightly awkward, Shetty said later, that’s because it was unexpected. “Richard does not understand Hindi,” she told a press conference. “All he knows is that Bollywood is all about song and dance. So, he decided to give a dance pose with me to entertain the crowd.”

But it may be more than than the Hindi language that Gere did not understand: His dance move and smooch on the cheek went way beyond what is acceptable, at least according to India’s Hindu nationalists who claim that Shetty has dishonored her culture. Protestors burned Gere and Shetty in effigy, and now plan to lodge a complaint against Shetty with the police. “How much can you degrade yourself because you are being paid money to make an appearance” asked Sumit Mishra, of the youth wing of the Hindu nationalist BJP party in the state of Bhopal. As a foreigner, said Mishra, Gere could be excused. “We are not bothered about how many times he kisses how many women in Hollywood. We are
troubled with Shilpa’s behavior. When the man was being outrageously indecent before a large gathering, why did she keep giggling” Mishra railed to the Times of India newspaper. “That encouraged him more. Why didn’t she protest”

But were the protests generated by real indignation, or were they just a ploy by the BJP and other nationalist parties to bolster their support Sudhir Kakar, who has written a novel based on the Kama Sutra and one of dozens of new translations of the ancient text, says the answer is both. “The people who protest want the masses to be offended by [the kiss],” says Kakar, a psychoanalyst and a former senior fellow at the Center for Study of World Religions at Harvard. “They want people not to go down the road towards erotic freedom. There’s a struggle going on for their votes, actually.”

This Indian version of America’s “culture wars” is at a much earlier
stage than its U.S. equivalent. The upper middle class that Kakar says is finally becoming “free from the sexual conservatism of the past” is still quite small, especially in comparison with the hundreds of millions who remain culturally conservative, if markedly less strident than the Hindu hard-liners Indian newspapers dub “the moral brigade.”

It’s this silent majority, says Kakar, whose anger the extremists are trying to arouse. “The main thing is family, so they see any kind of
sexuality as a threat to the family,” he says.

Shetty believes those protesting the incident are missing the point. “It is such a small issue,” she told reporters after the Gere brouhaha exploded. “Actually, I think it is not even an issue. There are bigger issues like AIDS in our country, which no one seems to be interested in talking about.” As politicians around the world know, though, it’s always easier to exploit controversy than tackle the difficult stuff.

Share

Will ‘Slumdog’ have its day at the Oscars?


The hero of "Slumdog Millionaire," a poverty-raised teaboy seeking his lost love, works his way through the questions on the game show "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" knowing that, at any time, he can lose and walk away with nothing.

At this point, the movie appears unlikely to face the same fate. The crowd-pleasing rags-to-riches story has been the winter’s surprise winner, racking up victories at practically every juncture. The Golden Globes gave “Slumdog” its top award; so did the Producers Guild, the Writers Guild, the Directors Guild and the BAFTAs. It doesn’t hurt that “Slumdog’s” production history is a rags-to-riches story as well, with the small-budgeted film caught in a downsizing at its initial American studio (the late Warner Independent Pictures, which was folded into parent Warner Bros.) and slated for straight-to-video until Fox Searchlight stepped in as U.S. distributor. From there, the honors started rolling in — and haven’t stopped yet. “I was completely exhilarated, but with disbelief, because it’s a small film with no expectations,” co-director Loveleen Tandan said after the film took home the Golden Globe for best drama. “I think that ‘Slumdog Millionaire’ is one of those very rare cases, where the movie comes out and you think, OK, that’s a good little movie … it will be happy to be nominated, and it will get some great recognition,” said Oscar historian Steve Pond, author of “The Big Show.” “And somehow it has hung on, and the bigger movies that came out afterwards did not click with people as much, and suddenly this little movie was the best story of the year.” That gives “Slumdog’s” best picture competition — “Milk,” “Frost/Nixon,” “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” and “The Reader” — a major challenge in stopping the little film’s momentum. See the complete list of nominees But “Slumdog’s” “Rocky”-like success story may also provide the Oscars with something it could use for ratings domination: a rooting interest. The 81st annual Academy Awards are scheduled for Sunday night on ABC.

Oscar ratings generally have been in decline throughout this decade, and without the blockbuster “The Dark Knight” among the best picture nominees, this year may be another down year. Indeed, as Variety editor Peter Bart writes in the March issue of Vanity Fair, not even the studios — almost all owned by major media conglomerates — appear very engaged. “With very few exceptions … companies were not out there pitching their projects to Oscar and Golden Globe voters with the sort of passionate advocacy of a [Oscar-winning producer] Harvey Weinstein,” wrote Bart. “To many of the top stars and agents, the Oscar, too, has become a prisoner of the bean counters.” Not even the bean counters are happy. The traditional Oscar nomination box-office bump has skipped all but “Slumdog,” with grosses for “Milk” and “Frost/Nixon” down as much as 33 percent week to week. Only “Benjamin Button” has topped $100 million at the domestic box office, and its budget was estimated at $150 million. (“Slumdog” should hit the $100 million mark by early March.) Moreover, according to The Hollywood Reporter, the accountants at ABC are dealing with a chunk of unsold commercial slots, partly thanks to the loss of the cosmetics brand L’Oreal, a perennial Oscar advertiser.

Don’t Miss
Black actors still face Oscar challenges

What it takes to make it in Hollywood

Special Report:  2009 Academy Awards

“A lot of cosmetics companies reach out to younger women, and those viewers are leaving in droves,” Shari Anne Brill, senior vice president/director at the media agency Carat, told The Hollywood Reporter. General Motors is also sitting the Oscars out after a decade of support. The Academy Awards ceremony is trying to strike back with a new host, the multitalented Hugh Jackman, who has earned raves for his handling of the Tonys, and what producers Bill Condon and Laurence Mark hope will be a few surprises. “Mistakes are our friends,” Mark told The New York Times. “It’s in the nature of television to restrain the spontaneity of a live event,” Condon added. “Things become more and more prepackaged.” iReport.com: Share your Oscar acceptance speech Both men have been coy as to what’s planned — or unplanned — with Condon telling The Associated Press that “we wanted to restore a kind of mystery to it.” But the kernel of their thinking could be inferred from a comment Mark made to the Times: “Once upon a time, if I’m not mistaken, it was a party. We’d like to bring back a little bit of party flavor.” Host Jackman is up for whatever is thrown at him. “My acting teacher always said, ‘No, don’t say nervous, you’re excited,’ ” he told Barbara Walters, according to an excerpt of an interview scheduled to air Sunday night. “And it, actually, that’s the truth. I think it’s, you know, I was saying to my wife, you know, it’s a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, literally it may be once.” For many of the nominees, it’s also a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Nine of the 20 acting nominees are first-timers, and several say they’re trying to enjoy the moment because it may never come again. “It’s something I never thought would happen,” said Richard Jenkins, nominated for best actor for his performance in “The Visitor.” “I’m terribly appreciative of this honor.” Watch Jenkins on the Oscar attention » With “Slumdog” the odds-on favorite to win best picture, Oscar observers are focusing on the acting races for dramatic kicks. Even Nate Silver, the mastermind of the political Web site FiveThirtyEight.com, which accurately predicted Barack Obama’s presidential victory in November, is getting into the act. Running this year’s nominees through a sieve of Oscar history, Silver told New York magazine the favorites are Mickey Rourke (“The Wrestler”), Kate Winslet (“The Reader”), Heath Ledger (“The Dark Knight”) and Taraji P. Henson (“Benjamin Button”). Ledger, who died in early 2008, could become the second performer to win an Oscar posthumously. Peter Finch won best actor for 1976’s “Network” two months after he died in 1977. A Henson win would prevent “Button,” which leads all films with 13 nominations, from going home empty-handed, a distinct possibility given the way the film has been shut out so far this awards season. The record for most nominations without a win is held by 1977’s “The Turning Point” and 1985’s “The Color Purple,” both of which went 0 for 11. iReport.com: Who will win at the Oscars But it’s “Slumdog,” which received 10 nominations, that seems destined to win the big prize. For a film about the power of fate, it can only be appropriate. As the film approaches its conclusion, the unctuous game show host Prem Kumar, played by Anil Kapoor, asks the poor teaboy, Jamal (Dev Patel), “So, are you ready for the final question for 20 million rupees” “No, but maybe it’s written, no” replies Jamal, throwing an earlier line from the host back at him. “Maybe,” says Kumar.

Maybe. Warner Bros. is owned by Time Warner, which is the parent company of CNN.

Share

Racism row over chimp cartoon sparks debate

A New York Post cartoon has sparked a debate over race and cartooning this week.
Racist, unfunny, hilarious, confusing, lame.

Reactions are as varied as they are strong to Tuesday’s New York Post cartoon that depicted the police shooting of a chimpanzee. Two police officers, one with a smoking gun, are near the chimp’s bullet-pierced body. “They’ll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill,” one officer says. The Post’s Sean Delonas used a typical editorial cartoon trope of linking two current news stories: the shooting of a chimp after it mauled a Connecticut woman and President Obama’s signing of the stimulus bill. But soon after the issue hit newsstands, the Rev. Al Sharpton, and other black opinion makers such as CNN’s Roland Martin, blasted the cartoon as an attack on Obama’s skin color and African-Americans in general. “Being that the stimulus bill has been the first legislative victory of President Barack Obama and has become synonymous with him, it is not a reach to wonder: Are they inferring that a monkey wrote the last bill” Sharpton said. Jelani Cobb, a Spelman College history professor and the author of a forthcoming book about Obama, told CNN that the cartoon offended on many levels. iReport.com: Chimp cartoon ‘very, very wrong’

Don’t Miss
Sharpton criticizes Post cartoon

Martin: NY Post cartoon is racist and careless

He winced at the cartoon’s gun violence as a stoker to the nervousness some feel about the safety of a black president in a historically racist country. “When I looked at it, there was no getting around the implications of it,” Cobb said. “Clearly anyone with an iota of sense knows the close association of black people and the primate imagery.” Dozens of cartoonists weighed in on dailycartoonist.com. Some said it was a simpleton move to use the tired metaphor of a monkey to make fun of something — no matter what it was. One poster wrote, “Wha…” pointing out that Obama didn’t write the stimulus package; lawmakers did. On the cartoon “danger scale” of 1 to 10, the chimp cartoon scored a 9, Dilbert creator Scott Adams told CNN. Adams liked the cartoon, but judging its overall worthiness is difficult, a gauge best measured by an audience, not the cartoonist, he said. “Any cartoon has to be a little bit dangerous, and he’s definitely achieved that,” he said. “You have to perceive that the cartoonist is in personal danger or there’s something dangerous about it, that at the cartoonist’s next cocktail party, half of the people there are going to want to poison his drink.” Just like George Carlin’s seven dirty words, there are also no-no’s for cartoons, Adams said. “He’s got everything you shouldn’t have,” he said. “Gunfire, that’s the one thing you cannot get away with. And then he’s got violence against animals, also a pretty big no.” New York Post editor Col Allan referred calls to a public relations representative, who sent CNN.com this statement: “The cartoon is a clear parody of a current news event, to wit the shooting of a violent chimpanzee in Connecticut. It broadly mocks Washington’s efforts to revive the economy. Again, Al Sharpton reveals himself as nothing more than a publicity opportunist.” Delonas was not giving interviews, the PR rep told CNN. If there is any apology due, it shouldn’t come from the cartoonist, insisted Ted Rall, the president of the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists, whose cartoons run in 100 publications across the United States. An editor should object if there is a strong possibility that a cartoon will not resonate the way the cartoonist wanted, he said. Cartoonists have to be free to be creative, to not edit themselves during the drawing process. “He was trying trying to jam two stories together, and unfortunately, this is what a lot of lame editors like,” Rall said. “The comparison he had in mind: The guy who wrote the package wasn’t Obama; it was a bunch of white economic advisers, and he [Delonas] wasn’t thinking about Obama.” The Post cartoonist, he added, has the misfortune of working in a business that, over the past decade, has become a graveyard of gag jokes. A former editor once told Rall that satire in cartooning died after September 11. “I have to wonder about the competence of his editors,” Rall continued. “It goes with the ‘make it shorter and dumber’ mentality that’s happening in print.” But later Thursday the New York Post apologized in a statement on its Web site, although they also defended its action and blasted some detractors. “Wednesday’s Page Six cartoon — caricaturing Monday’s police shooting of a chimpanzee in Connecticut — has created considerable controversy,” the paper said. The Post said the cartoon was meant to mock what it called an “ineptly written” stimulus bill. “But it has been taken as something else — as a depiction of President Obama, as a thinly veiled expression of racism,” reads the statement. “This most certainly was not its intent; to those who were offended by the image, we apologize.” But the statement immediately swerves to fire back at some of the image’s critics. “However, there are some in the media and in public life who have had differences with The Post in the past — and they see the incident as an opportunity for payback,” the statement says. “To them, no apology is due. Sometimes a cartoon is just a cartoon — even as the opportunists seek to make it something else.” Cartoonist John Auchter of the Grand Rapids Business Journal in Michigan said Delonas had to expect people to be offended. “The racial connotation of what he drew, it’s really silly that either he or his editors couldn’t anticipate that [reaction],” Auchter said. “When I think about all the things that are thrown around here with the accusations of being racist … that is one of the things as a cartoonist you have to be aware of — what you’re doing and that you know things are going to be taken that way. You are the first-line editor.” Syndicated political cartoonist Chip Bok didn’t find the Post cartoon racist, but he said it probably was in bad taste. “A woman was terribly mauled and almost killed,” he said. “That’s really the only grounds by which [my editors] would throw out a cartoon. When it involves somebody’s life like that, I would tend to stay away from it.” Bok knows a little about what it feels like to create a polarizing cartoon. In 2006, around the time of the Danish Mohammed cartoon controversy, the Akron Beacon Journal published a cartoon he drew showing a blurred picture of Mohammed on CNN. The cartoonist had been watching the network cover the story about Muslim anger over the Danish cartoons, which showed the prophet with a bomb crafted out of his turban. Bok was upset that CNN had chosen to blur the cartoon in its coverage. The cartoonist immediately drew his cartoon, which showed a couple watching TV and saying, “Well, no wonder Muslims are upset. Muhammad looks like he’s on acid.” “I was inundated with e-mail, the paper was picketed,” he said. “There was quite a reaction.”

Share

Obama tackles thorny economic, military issues in Canada trip

President Obama and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper meet the media Thursday in Ottawa.
President Obama visited Canada on Thursday in his first foreign trip as head of state, meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper to discuss a range of complicated economic and military issues.

Obama and Harper discussed possible remedies for the global economic downturn, a new initiative to fight global warming and the ongoing struggle against Taliban and al Qaeda elements in Afghanistan, the leaders said during a joint news conference. The struggling economy was at the top of the agenda, with emphasis on the controversy surrounding the “buy American” clause in the recently passed U.S. economic stimulus package. Canadians worry that the provision marks a resurgence of protectionism. It requires the use of U.S.-produced iron, steel and other manufactured goods in public works projects that the $787 billion package funds. “It was very important to make sure that any provisions [in the stimulus plan] … were consonant to our [obligations] under the WTO and NAFTA,” Obama said. That goal, he added, had been achieved. “I want to grow trade, and not contract it,” he said. “I don’t think there’s anything in the recovery package that’s adverse to that goal.” As “one of the largest economies in the world, it’s important for us to make sure that we are showing leadership in the belief that trade ultimately is beneficial to all countries,” he added. Watch Obama express his commitment to economic recovery »

Don’t Miss
Obama to walk trade tightrope

Extra forces could stay in Afghanistan 5 years

Obama: Troops alone cannot win in Afghanistan

There are provisions in both the World Trade Organization pact and the North American Free Trade Agreement, Harper said, that allow governments to assert domestic preferences and purchasing policies. “These things are allowed in some cases, but they are certainly not allowed without limit,” he said. “We expect the United States to adhere to its international obligations.” The Canadian government says that more than 7 million American jobs directly depend on trade with Canada. iReport.com: Canadians’ advice for Obama Obama and Harper also announced the establishment of a joint U.S.-Canadian “clean energy dialogue” to help forge initiatives to fight global warming. The dialogue commits senior officials from both countries to collaborate on the development of clean energy, science and technologies. It will “strengthen our joint research and development,” Obama said. “It will advance carbon reduction technologies. And it will support the development of an electric grid that can help deliver the clean and renewable energy of the future to homes and businesses, both in Canada and the United States. Global warming, he added, “is not just a U.S. or a Canadian issue. … This is a worldwide issue that we’re going to have to confront, [and] as two wealthy countries, it’s important for us to show leadership on this issue.” Canada has had trouble establishing “an effective [environmental] regulatory regime alone,” noted Harper, who said he is optimistic that the United States will now “provide leadership to the world on the climate change issue.” Both leaders brushed aside concerns over differences between their nations in the struggle in Afghanistan and the larger war on terror. Watch more on the U.S. efforts in Afghanistan » Obama said he did not press Harper for any additional Canadian troop commitments to the Afghan war. He refused to answer a question about whether he would send more U.S. troops beyond the 17,000 committed earlier this week. Gen. David McKiernan, the U.S. commander in Afghanistan, has requested an additional 30,000 troops to help reverse what have been, according to most analysts, recent gains for al Qaeda and Taliban elements. Canada is focused primarily on training the Afghan army, Harper said, “so the Afghans themselves can become responsible for their day-to-day security.” Ultimately, he said, the job of establishing peace and security in Afghanistan can only be achieved by the Afghans themselves. View a chart of U.S. troop levels in Afghanistan » Harper said Canada takes “security concerns as seriously as our American friends” and expressed confidence that the relationship between the two countries will remain strong regardless of any current differences.

“Canada and the United States are closer economically, socially, culturally, in terms of our international partnerships, than any two nations on the face of the Earth — closer friends than any two nations on the face of the Earth. And I think we can safely predict that in four years’ time, we will be in exactly the same spot,” he concluded. Watch Obama talk about the importance of Canada-U.S. ties » The two leaders addressed the media after a working lunch in the Canadian Parliament’s historic Senate dining room. The ornately furnished chamber has been an elaborate temporary office for numerous heads of state, including most notably King George VI in 1939 and Queen Elizabeth II in 1967 and 1981.

Share

Study: Proximity to fast-food restaurants linked to stroke risk

Fast-food restaurants may be associated with stroke risk, a new study says. Some say there's not enough evidence.
A person’s risk of stroke is associated with the number of fast-food restaurants near their residence, according to a study presented Thursday at a stroke conference in San Diego, California.

Researchers led by Dr. Lewis B. Morgenstern at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor counted 1,247 strokes caused by blood clots in 64 census tracts in Nueces County, Texas, which includes Corpus Christi, from January 2000 through June 2003. They also mapped the county’s 262 fast-food restaurants and then adjusted for socioeconomic status and demographics and found a statistically significant association. “The association suggested that the risk of stroke in a neighborhood increased by 1 percent for every fast-food restaurant,” the authors wrote in a poster presented at the American Stroke Association’s International Stroke Conference. Residents of neighborhoods in the 75th percentile of fast-food restaurants had a 6 percent increased risk of stroke compared with residents of the 25th percentile of such eateries, according to the study, which was paid for by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Morgenstern, director of the University of Michigan’s stroke program and professor of neurology and epidemiology, warned that the finding does not prove that proximity to fast-food restaurants caused the increase in strokes of people living nearby. “What we don’t know is whether fast food actually increased the risk because of its contents or whether fast-food restaurants are a marker of unhealthy neighborhoods,” he said. Still, he added, “If this association is causal, the findings have large public health importance due to the high prevalence of fast-food restaurants.”

Health Library
MayoClinic.com: Understanding heart and blood vessel conditions

A spokeswoman for the National Restaurant Association lambasted that concern as unsupported by the data. “This article is seriously flawed and by its own admission shows no correlation whatsoever between dining at chain restaurants and incidence of stroke,” Beth Johnson said. “Further, it tells us nothing about the eating and exercise habits of the individuals involved. The restaurant industry continues to offer a growing number of healthier offerings, move away from the use of trans fats and provide more nutrition information. “In fact, the National Restaurant Association strongly supports a national, uniform approach to providing detailed nutrition information in chain restaurants. Constructive and responsive measures like these, and not misleading studies, will help consumers make healthy choices for themselves and their families,” she added.

Share

Nearly intact mammoth skeleton a rare find in L.A.


He had a rough life during the Ice Age, walking around with a couple of broken ribs and a possibly cancerous lesion on his jaw before dying at a young age.

Now, at least 10,000 years later, visitors in Los Angeles, California, can see the remains of “Zed,” a Columbian mammoth whose nearly intact skeleton is part of what is being described as a key find by archaeologists at Los Angeles’ George C. Page Museum. Zed was discovered at a construction site in the heart of Los Angeles. An earth mover helping to build an underground parking garage near the L.A. County Museum of Art uncovered the mammoth’s skull, according to project director Christopher Shaw. “The skull was hit and shaved off … by a scraper,” Shaw told CNN Thursday. “We don’t know just how smashed up it is, but it’s fairly intact because it’s a huge jacket we put it around.” The mammoth’s fossil was among 16 deposits at the site that archaeologists wrapped, along with the surrounding dirt, in plaster jackets, creating 23 boxes weighing between 5 and 53 tons that were then lifted out intact. The construction was being monitored by an archaeological consulting firm because the site is so close to the La Brea tar pits — an archeological site that has yielded 100 million bones belonging to 300 species of mammals and birds. Construction on the parking garage began in 2006, but it took two more years for all the recovered materials to be handed over to researchers at the Page Museum, who began analyzing the various fossils in June, Shaw said. “It’s very exciting for us because each one of these … could be different ages in the past 10,000 to 45,000 years,” Shaw said.

Don’t Miss
Prehistoric ‘monster snake’ remains discovered

110-year-old ‘living fossil’ becomes a dad

John Harris, the head curator of the Page Museum, publicly announced the finding of “a whole new treasure trove of fossils” on Wednesday. He described it as “the most important discovery” for the museum “of the last 90 years.” Shaw said the announcement was made to “create interest” in the museum’s discovery. Among the most interesting items is likely to be Zed, who is believed to have died in his late 40s. Mammoths are thought to have had an average lifespan of about 60 years. Not all of Zed’s remains have been cleaned off and analyzed. “Right now we have opened the plaster jacket of four sections that were excavated, including vertebrae and ribs and pelvis, one tusk and the lower jaw,” Shaw said. “It will take another six to 12 months to open everything.” Shaw said both of Zed’s tusks were found intact, which is very rare. “Previously, we’ve found mammoths but the tusk material was very poorly preserved,” Shaw said. “It’s very exciting to us to have these two complete, beautifully preserved tusks.” The excitement generated by Zed and the rest of the archaeological find could help boost the Page Museum’s attendance and funding, which is key as many museums are seeing their attendance dry up during the recession. “The cleaning of Zed can be viewed inside the museum inside the ‘fishbowl’ — a windowed area — as parts of his bones are being cleaned,” Shaw said. “So people come to see us and we’ve constructed small exhibits. It will attract a lot of people and that will help our funding situation.” Researchers hope to have the entire skeleton on display by next year. Shaw said it is unique to have such a major fossil find in the heart of an urban center like Los Angeles. “I’ve always said we’re kind of spoiled here in Rancho La Brea,” he said. “It’s not like going to the Gobi Desert where you can’t take a shower for weeks.” While the process of cleaning and analyzing the fossils is very intricate and time-consuming, Shaw said it is a rare experience for researchers to come in to work and not know what they will discover that day. “Every day we come to work, we’re uncovering things that haven’t seen the light of day for 40,000 years,” he said. “It’s an exciting thing that we’re doing just that.”

Share

U.N. report: Uranium traces found at site in Syria

IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei is asking nations, including Israel, to make relevant information available.
The U.N. nuclear agency said it found traces of uranium from samples retrieved at a Syrian site suspected to be the location of a nuclear site, according to a report posted Thursday on the Institute for Science and International Security Web site.

The site was bombed by Israeli aircraft in September 2007, and the report said Syria says the missiles that destroyed the building at the site were the source of the uranium particles. The International Atomic Energy Agency’s report said that the uranium particles “are of a type not included in Syria’s declared inventory of nuclear material” and that “there is a low probability that the uranium was introduced by the use of missiles.” But “the presence of the uranium particles,” site imagery and procurement information “need to be fully understood,” it said. Syria needs to provide more information and documentation about “the use and nature” of a building that was bombed and its procurement activities, the report said. And Syria “needs to be transparent by providing access to other locations alleged to be related” to the site. In the report, IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei urged Israel and other states to make relevant information available to the agency and agree to the IAEA sharing the information with Syria. In November, the agency asked Israel to provide information in response to Syria’s claims that its munitions could have been the source of the uranium particles. Israel said in a December 24 letter that “it rejects Syrian claims on the matter” and that “Israel could not have been the source of the uranium particles found on the site of the nuclear reactor.” In November, ElBaradei confirmed that his agency found traces of “man-made uranium” at a site in eastern Syria. IAEA inspectors collected soil samples from the Al-Kibar site in June. ElBaradei said at the time that a report would be issued. He added that the findings do not necessarily mean the Syrians were building a reactor and cautioned against rushing to judgment. But he urged more “transparency” from the Syrian government in its dealings with the IAEA and deplored the “unilateral” Israeli bombing of the Syrian site. Syrian authorities have reacted angrily to accusations that they were building a nuclear reactor. Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Moualem suggested that any trace of uranium unearthed at the military site in eastern Syria came from Israeli bombs.

Share

Roy Blunt’s announcement sets up showdown in Missouri

Former House Republican Whip Roy Blunt announced he will run for a Missouri Senate seat.
Missouri Rep. Roy Blunt Thursday announced his intention to run for a seat in the U.S. Senate, a move that sets up what is likely to be a showdown between two prominent families in one of the country’s most politically divided states.

Making the official announcement in St. Louis, Missouri, the former House Republican whip indicated he would run on a platform of keeping Democratic control of both Congress and the White House in check. “Common sense and open debate are in danger of being suppressed by the overreaching liberal monopoly in Congress and the White House,” he said, according to prepared remarks. “Never has Washington been in greater need of hearing from people who work hard, pay their taxes and want solutions to urgent economic problems and the ongoing threat of terrorism.” “My sense is Missourians and Americans are not well served by one-party rule,” Blunt also said, citing the massive stimulus measure signed by President Obama that won little Republican support.

Don’t Miss
Possible fight looms over New York Senate seat

Blunt’s announcement comes two weeks after Democrat Robin Carnahan jumped into the race. Carnahan is another Missourian with prominent name recognition who enjoys widespread support. “The Missouri Senate race is shaping up to be one of the most competitive races of the cycle,” said Nathan Gonzalez, political editor of the Rothenberg Report. “It has attracted two of the biggest names of the state that has a history of closest elections.” Both Blunt and Carnahan are seeking the Senate seat set to be vacated by longtime Missouri Republican Kit Bond. Blunt, a six-term congressman representing the state’s conservative southwestern corner, is a longtime Missouri politician with high name recognition across the state and solid support among his party’s conservative base. He has run for statewide office several times during his nascent political career, having served as secretary of state for two terms before losing the Republican primary for governor in 1992. His son Matt also served as the state’s governor from 2005-2009, but ultimately decided not to seek another term because of low approval ratings. Blunt faces a state that has become increasing Democratic in the last several election cycles. The state’s other Senate seat went Democratic in 2006 with Claire McCaskill’s narrow win, and Democrat Jay Nixon was elected governor of the state in 2008. But Republicans still hold edges in the state’s House and Senate chambers and have a majority of the state’s nine congressional seats. While Blunt is likely to enjoy the support of the party’s establishment, he could face a competitive primary challenge from former state Treasurer Sarah Steelman, a vocal critic of her party’s leadership who narrowly lost a bruising primary bid for governor last year. Even though she is not particularly popular in her party, Steelman’s message of reform could resonate if the GOP’s national approval ratings remain low throughout the next two years. “Republicans would like to avoid a primary in the Senate race, but she’s not the kind of person they will be able to just shove out of a race,” Gonzalez said. “She relishes in being in an outsider role.” But should Blunt make it to a general election facing Carnahan, the race will likely become a hard-fought and high-profile battle of two powerful political names. Carnahan’s father, Mel, served as governor of the state from 1993-2000 and died in a plane crash while running for the U.S. Senate. Carnahan still won the seat, defeating then-Republican Sen. John Ashcroft, and Carnahan’s wife Jean held the post for two years. Carnahan’s brother is also a U.S. congressman representing the outskirts of St. Louis. But national Democrats are eager for a match-up against Blunt, who was a protégé to former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay and has been linked to disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff. “As one of the faces of the same old Republican Party, Roy Blunt enters this race with a whole lot of baggage and a whole lot of questions to answer,” said Eric Schultz, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee’s communication’s director. Democrats will also highlight Blunt’s stalwart support of former President Bush, especially when it comes to economic policies. “I’d hate to be him, and explaining my votes on the Bush positions,” DSCC chairman Bob Menendez said of Blunt last week. “They got their ideas into law. It created one of the worst economies I have ever seen.”

Share

Bishop who denied Holocaust ordered to leave Argentina

Bishop Richard Williamson had denied the existence of the Holocaust, saying there were no gas chambers.
Bishop Richard Williamson, who last month denied the existence of the Holocaust in an interview with Swedish television, was ordered Thursday to leave Argentina within 10 days, the Ministry of Interior said.

“The bishop has repeatedly forged the true motive for his stay in the country, having declared that he is an employee of ‘La Tradicion’ Civil Society when, in reality, his true activity was as priest and seminary director of the Society of Saint Pius X in the neighborhood of Moreno,” Interior Minister Florencio Randazzo said in a written statement. Williamson and three other bishops who belong to the Society of Saint Pius X were excommunicated in 1988. The society was founded by Archbishop Marcel Lefebrve, who rebelled against the Vatican’s modernizing reforms in the 1960s, and who consecrated the men in unsanctioned ceremonies. “Williamson has had public notoriety following his anti-Semitic statements to Swedish media in which he questioned whether Jewish people were victims of the Holocaust,” Randazzo continued. “For these reasons, along with the strong condemnation from the Argentine government of how statements like these harm Argentine society, the Jewish community, and all of humanity by trying to deny a historic truth, the national government has decided to demand that the Bishop leave the country or be expelled.” In the interview with Swedish television, Williamson said, “I believe that the historical evidence is strongly against — is hugely against — 6 million Jews having been deliberately gassed in gas chambers as a deliberate policy of Adolf Hitler.

Don’t Miss
Holocaust denier removed as head of Argentine seminary

Bishops say ‘no room’ for Holocaust denier in Catholicism

Pope’s move angers Jews

Vatican: Bishop must recant Holocaust denial

“I believe there were no gas chambers,” he stated. Williamson, who had already been removed from his seminary post in Argentina, made headlines in January when he and three other ultra-conservative bishops were welcomed back into the Roman Catholic Church, more than 20 years after Pope John Paul II excommunicated them on a theological question unrelated to the Holocaust. The rehabilitation of Williamson sparked condemnation from Israel, American Jewish leaders and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, among others. The Vatican pointed to several statements by Pope Benedict XVI condemning the destruction of European Jewry. The pope said he did not know of Williamson’s views on the Holocaust when he lifted the excommunication. The Vatican said Williamson will not be allowed to perform priestly functions until he recants his Holocaust denial. Williamson apologized for “distress” his remarks caused the pope, but has not retracted them. Last week, a German court refused to intervene on behalf of Williamson, who is facing prosecution for denying the Holocaust — a crime in Germany.

Share